Bid Lifecycle

Opportunity Pipeline

Is there a defined customer need? Is it a real need or a perceived one?

How robust is your bid pipeline? Do you have visibility of the ‘must-win’ deals for next six months and beyond? Do your sales team have to formally ‘call out’ an opportunity before you support it? Or, is your pipeline of deals quite literally the bids and proposals you are submitting in the next few weeks?

In our experience, top performing bid teams know what deals are coming down the pipeline many months ahead and allocate resources appropriately. They frequently use the pipeline as a tool for justifying headcount growth within the bid team, whether it’s a permanent hire or contract support for one specific deal. They will also use the pipeline to help sales teams gather the necessary intelligence on the anticipated competition, capturing as much detail as possible for use later in the cycle.

Solution Development

Do you have a solution that can be delivered within the client’s timescales and budget? Have you developed and tested this with the client to shape the RFP requirements?

When we talk to clients about the importance of solution development early in the Bid Lifecycle, we often receive a dismissive glare that shouts (quietly) that it’s simply not possible to develop a solution without a detailed set of requirements.

In any sales process there is a huge amount of ambiguity right up until the point of contract signature, and often beyond into due diligence and transition. We believe clients that get to grips with this ambiguity early in the cycle are much more likely to influence the client’s requirements and, in many cases, write or heavily influence the RFP.

Do you start mapping out the solution at this stage, testing your assumptions with the client? If you do, you can put yourself in the driving seat very early in the procurement process.

If the client isn’t willing to enter constructive dialogue with you at this stage, you may need to question their motives. They may have good reason, but they may just be coming to market as a cost saving exercise, rather than to drive significant change.

Value Proposition Development

Can you quantify how your solution will meet or exceed the client’s requirements?

At times, developing value propositions can feel like getting blood out of a stone. The problem typically starts with all bid stakeholders having a different view of what a value proposition represents. A quick Google of the phrase serves only to muddy the waters further. There is much talk of ‘a promise of value to be delivered’ or a ‘summary of how your product or service benefits your customers’.

APMP defines it as ‘a statement in a proposal that specifically addresses how aspects of an offer positively affect the customer’s business. Value propositions should provide customer-specific statements that are quantified and describe tangible and intangible value.’

For us, the key word in this definition is ‘quantified’. It must be more than just a collection of features or benefits. If you talk about being innovative (don’t we all…), do you quantify it? If your focus is on sustainability, can you quantify it?

Your value proposition should drive your entire bid process and not be a last-minute insertion into your proposal. How pivotal is it in your bids?

Bid Marketing

Is your value proposition visually compelling? Does it address all decision makers’ needs? Does it pass the five second ‘Billboard’ test?

Mention bid marketing and most people think of nice-looking graphics in a proposal document or anything that goes beyond a standard front cover with your client’s logo placed bottom right.

To be fair, we were probably in that category until we had the opportunity to work with Simon Wellstead (our go-to marketing guru). He transformed our thinking around what constitutes bid marketing, and how it should influence decision makers in the Bid Lifecycle.

If you advertise on a billboard, you only get five seconds for your design to make an impact on passing traffic. Simon taught us the importance of this concept not just on proposal design, but on all bidding communications you have with your target client. Are you able to render your value proposition in such a way that your buyer will understand it immediately and keep thinking about it long after they’ve seen it?

Put your last five submitted proposals on a table. Take the title off and what is the marketing message? Is there a story being told in the imagery or just a nice picture of your HQ, or worse still your product? If so, it might be time to re-think your Bid Marketing Strategy.

Win Strategy

Does your win strategy balance the needs of the client with internal pressures and the competition? Is it fully understood by everyone contributing to the bid?

Developing a win strategy is no simple task. It relies on multiple sources of good data and information and on the ability of a team or individual to assimilate that information.

Win strategy is often confused with features and benefits. That generally omits one major stakeholder in the process – the client. Without detailed knowledge of your clients’ issues, challenges or growth plans, you will be relying largely on hope.

Issue 1 of Bidding Quarterly discussed win strategy and concluded emphatically that hope should never be a strategy.

It is often argued that price is not a win strategy. It certainly can be if you have taken account of all client issues, you’ve reviewed the competition, and you’ve conducted a SWOT analysis of your own position.

Next time you are presented with a win strategy, ask yourself does it really balance your client’s needs with your own business plan? Is a win strategy a key requirement of your bid process?

Qualification

Do you have enough information to objectively assess whether an opportunity represents good, profitable business? Can you provide a compliant solution? Can you deliver it? Can you win it?

We know for many people in our profession, a qualification meeting can be the gateway to taking some degree of responsibility for an opportunity.

We generally argue that each stage of the Bid Lifecycle is equally important to winning business. However, Qualification often has the most significant financial implications; getting it wrong can dramatically increase your costs.

One of the biggest challenges in qualification meetings is tempering the excitement of a new opportunity with the realities of winning it. All too often, qualification meetings are a fait accompli. The glittering prize on offer often blurs judgement, or worse the bid team are coerced (I’ve been there) into working an opportunity because someone somewhere has decided it is ‘strategic’, without actually providing the back story.

Is Qualification a once only event or are you constantly re-evaluating your chances of winning throughout the life of the bid? Has pride ever prevented you from bowing out of a bid midway through the tendering process?

Bid Resource Allocation

Can you assemble a winning bid team within the timescales? Are all the supporting functions aligned to the bid requirements?

One thing we learnt very early on in our bidding careers was that ‘availability is not a skill’. Assembling a bid team often relies on calling in favours or begging, stealing and borrowing resource from other parts of the business. We all want to build the ‘A-Team’ for our bid because ours is the most important one, right?

And so, the bun fight begins. Internal politics can heavily influence your chances of securing the right resource for your deal, rather than your chances of winning.

Do you have a process for ringfencing bid resource as soon as the bid is qualified in, or just hope the right person accepts your bid kick-off meeting request? Are key contributors bought into the value proposition and actively shaping the deal, or are they just handed a list of questions that need a response? Do your job descriptions for supporting functions list ‘bid support’ as a key part of their job? Is availability of resource even considered a risk to your chances of winning, or are people just expected to pull an all-nighter?

Pre-Proposal Planning

Could you draft an Executive Summary before the RFP arrives? Have you pre-empted questions about your solution and drafted answers?

Many people in our profession love the buzz a deadline gives them. Stress, in the right form, is not necessarily always a bad thing.

So how then do we motivate our bid and sales teams to create some of the most important bid content and proposal responses ahead of receiving an RFI or RFP?

In his pre-proposal planning article in Bidding Quarterly 8 Jon Williams articulates it brilliantly … ‘I want to be confident that we have more momentum behind our proposal effort than anyone else in the race by the time the RFP lands. I’ll have fired up my team, making sure they’re motivated, hungry, excited’.

How do you get your Sales Lead fired up to draft an Executive Summary before an RFP arrives? Do you have a ‘Carrot’ or ‘Stick’ approach? Is pre-proposal planning a recognised step in your bid process?

RFI Submission

Does your team understand the importance of the RFI phase in the procurement cycle?

Is your response a capability statement or a focussed high-scoring proposal detailing why you will win?

RFIs can be really annoying – there, we’ve said it. They are not the main event, yet they ask lots of detailed questions about corporate financials or obscure policies that you can never quite get the latest versions of. In the priority list, they tend to sit beneath live bids and, in our experience, are often completed and submitted by the most junior person in the team.

Treating RFIs, PQQs or EOIs with a lack of respect is falling straight into the procurement bear trap. Andy Haigh, our BQ Public Sector Expert, transformed our thinking on this phase of the Bid Lifecycle when he instilled the idea that procurement teams are looking for reasons to reject suppliers at this stage, rather than progress them. With limited resource, there are only so many suppliers they can take through the RFP process.

How do you manage this phase of the Bid Lifecycle? Do you have a dedicated RFI team? Do you fill them with standard marketing blurb or focussed responses? Do they follow the same stringent review and sign-off process as the RFP stage?

RFP / ITT Submission

Do you manage the RFP / ITT submission as a distinct project in parallel with the bid campaign?

What’s the difference between a Bid Manager and a Proposal Manager? This is our number one FAQ. Whilst there is no universal agreement (we discuss it in more detail here), we believe a Bid Manager should be focused on managing all the stages of the Bid Lifecycle (of which the proposal is one), including pre- and post-submission activities. The Proposal Manager is almost entirely focussed on the RFP / ITT submission.

But what about role ‘overlap’ at RFP stage? Who takes responsibility? In a large corporation that has a mature sales function, you may find all six of our core bid roles overlapping, but with clearly defined interaction and responsibilities. In a SME, one person could be wearing six different bid hats depending on the day of the week.

Whatever your view, the challenge is to ensure all activities required to win are focussed on the finish line. Get the ‘balance’ wrong and you risk dropping out of the race.

Kick-Off

Do all key stakeholders and executive sponsors attend the kick-off meeting? Do they commit to both the win strategy and delivering their contributions in line with key deadlines?

Our MDs first job out of university was as a Bid Manager for a large IT Reseller (very last century…). He had absolutely no idea what a Bid Manager did, but it was in London and it paid well, so of course he took it. He still remembers his first day vividly…

“I was called into this meeting called a ‘kick-off’ and everybody sat quietly as we worked through every single question in the RFP and agreed who would answer it. This wasn’t such a tough job after all I thought. Of course, we lost. This process repeated itself several times before I realised there was much more to winning than just setting everyone on their way and ensuring every question had an answer.”

The bid kick-off is an important milestone in the bid process and much work needs to have gone before if you are to have a truly effective meeting. It is not by chance that we only get to bid kick-off at stage twelve of our Bid Lifecycle.

There should be no big surprises at this stage. If bid kick-off is still the first milestone in your bid process, you might want to reconsider going all in.

Solution Design

Are your subject matter experts skilled at producing proposal content that articulates complex detail in a way this it is easy to assimilate and score?

Learning the corporate jargon almost feels like a rite of passage in many of the organisations that we’ve worked in. You no longer feel like the new kid on the block when you can sit in a meeting and instantly decipher the TLAs going back and forth like a game of ping pong.

We all like to feel knowledgeable, and strangely the Three Letter Acronym seems to give us a level of confidence that we know what we are talking about.

Just how TLA-heavy are the solutions you propose? Are they written in a complex way that excites your internal team who ‘get’ this stuff, or are they articulated in plain English, in a way that is easy to score whoever the reader? Do you always use a readability checker such as Microsoft Word’s “Flesch Reading Ease” score?

Organisations who come a close second typically provide a great solution, they just don’t communicate in the client’s dialect.

Commercial Strategy

Is your client’s view on ‘price versus value’ understood by key decision makers? Are you exploiting differences in financial models and assumptions?

We’ve talked lots about understanding our clients’ needs and having the right team in place to win business as part of the Bid Lifecycle challenge, but we’d be fooling ourselves if we believed price and value weren’t equally as important.

Over the years we’ve witnessed far too many deals lacking a commercial bid strategy. This typically leads to pricing in silos, excessive margin layering and accounting for risk in different ways. The end result is a bid full of assumptions and caveats to reduce the final price, or worse, one that’s taken a last-minute scythe to the solution.

As bid professionals, is commercial strategy part of your remit, or is it just something you leave space in the proposal for the finance and sales team to complete? Is your team skilled in Pricing-to-Win or other pricing methodologies? With APMP planning to launch a micro certification in this discipline, are you looking to expand your skillset?

Proposal Writing

Can your proposal writers articulate the solution and value proposition in a way that engages the evaluator, creates empathy and scores maximum points? Do they have the skills to deconstruct questions, storyboard responses, and communicate in plain written English? Do you have a process for managing the risks associated with Generative AI content?

What makes a great proposal writer? Who makes a great proposal writer? We think most in our profession consider themselves competent, if not professional, writers.

Do a quick search on bid training courses and over 90% of the results focus on bid and proposal writing. There are some fantastic courses available, so we have no excuse for submitting poorly written proposals.

But when a client asks me ‘how good’ our writers are, we struggle to answer. Not because we don’t recognise good writing or understand how a proposal should be structured, but more because writing is so subjective and there is no definitive measure of ‘good’. Many writers are more akin to editors – they critique well but often struggle when presented with a blank piece of paper. It’s such an oddity that no universal proposal writing qualification exists in our profession. Thankfully, there are Creative Writing, Journalistic, and English Language qualifications, and these all provide the required skills for writing bids.

So, the next time you ask your Sales lead or SME to crack on with writing the executive summary or solution, ask yourself if they have the right skills or perhaps instead, are feeling somewhat intimidated by the task.

Content Library

Do you have access to a library of professionally written proposal content that is both current and easily customisable?

One of the first questions we always get asked when benchmarking a bid or proposal function is “What proposal automation and content management software do you recommend?”

Whilst we could offer an instant response, we try to back track the conversation and understand why an automated solution or content library is so high on their priority list. At the core of most answers is a drive for efficiency – they are under pressure to produce more proposals, faster, and with fewer people.

When we ask about the additional resource they will be employing to manage the content and library, we get a look of confusion – we want more with less, not more with more? And that is where we find most organisations who implement company-wide proposal libraries go wrong. Libraries can drive massive efficiencies if implemented right, but never underestimate the time needed to maintain content quality – to ensure it is owned, managed, relevant, and proposal ready. Fail in that and you end up with GIGO. Kathryn Potter, our BQ Content Expert, discussed this in her article ‘A stitch in time saves nine’ in BQ6.

Proposal Review

Does your review team emulate the evaluation team? Are clear expectations set for reviewers? Do you have independent proof-readers? Do you tag content that can be reused in future bids?

It’s still a standing joke in our office. Our MD sent a communication to nearly 8,000 people and the second word was misspelt. It was supposed to start with ‘I’m excited….’. Instead, everyone received ‘I’m exited….’. How the hell can that happen?

He had read it twenty times, but his brain read over the error because he was too familiar with the content. Microsoft Word was happy because it was neither a typo nor grammatically incorrect. It still haunts him to this day, but it forced him to seek out the services of a professional proofreader and we now work with the brilliant Lisa Readman.

But what did we learn from it? Firstly, it is difficult, if not impossible to review your own work. Secondly, when asking people to review a document, you must give them clear instruction on exactly what it is you want them to check – is it style, grammar, spelling, content, or readability? If you follow Shipley’s Colour Team Reviews, do reviewers understand what the different colours mean?

Peter McPartland wrote a thought-provoking article in BQ5 on reviewing documents and the importance of providing structured feedback – definitely worth a read if you are keen to learn more about this often-neglected aspect of proposal management.

Production and Delivery

Does your production plan have contingency built in? Have you considered outsourcing? If delivering electronically, do you consider file size and the customer’s upload limits?

If it’s going to go wrong, this is often the stage when it can hurt you most. The deadline is almost upon you and there is very little wiggle room left. We swear printers and their uncanny knack for breaking down at critical times have taken years off our lives. Whilst outsourcing is a great option, it’s always a leap of faith trusting that everything will come back quality checked and collated just as you want it.

Thankfully, most submissions are now electronic, but that doesn’t make them any more straightforward. Having to ditch important graphics because you’re only given text fields or reducing image quality to meet submission guidelines can massively affect the impact you were hoping to make. Similarly, spending hours removing the extra spacing at paragraph ends to ensure your submission is within character count limits can be painful.

Don’t always assume couriers will deliver to the right location – we learnt that the hard way. Producing a ‘final, final’ version and managing the tinkering that inevitably goes on can be a change control nightmare. Do you do a dry run submission to fully understand the portal’s limitations? How do you ensure contingency is built into this phase of the Bid Lifecycle?

Bid Presentation

Does your presentation clearly articulate your value proposition and win themes? Do you run a dress rehearsal? Do executive sponsors attend?

You’ve made it to bid presentation stage – this is it, your last real chance to influence the client and close the deal. Your ‘A-team’ was working on the presentation material whilst producing the RFP response, so they dovetail beautifully. You’ve rehearsed several times and you have got the CEO to attend, or at least commit to recording a personalised video that cements their commitment. Does that sound familiar?

Or is it a last-minute panic, where your grab the slide deck from your last pitch and top and tail it? Do you coordinate roles in the client’s car park and hope for the best? I’m amazed how many companies still use their corporate standard pitch deck at presentation stage and assume adding a slide or two about the client and solution will get them over the line in first place. Much like the RFI Submission stage, this is another potential bear trap. Do you even get involved in bid presentations? One litmus test I use when differentiating between Bid and Proposal Managers is how involved they are in this phase of the Bid Lifecycle.

Clarifications

Are you using clarification questions as a positioning tool and strategic sales enabler?

Just how much more detail do they want? You’ve diligently completed a RFI, you’ve slogged it out for weeks on the RFP, you pulled out all the stops for the presentation, and yet they just keep asking more and more questions.

It’s so easy to become complacent at this stage of the deal. Whether it’s simply bidders fatigue or just assuming the scoring is done and dusted and you don’t need support from the bid team, it can prove disastrous.

AndY Haigh does this subject more justice than we ever could in his article in BQ2.

Bid Negotiation

Have you modelled the risks and financial impact of any anticipated negotiation? Have you calculated your best and final offer?

We all love to do a deal. Feeling we have got more for our money or negotiating someone down on price to make something affordable can be very uplifting.

However, haggling over the price of a second-hand car does not necessarily put us into the ‘skilled negotiator’ category.

Sarah Hinchliffe wrote a brilliant article in BQ9 where she applied the negotiating skills of a leading hostage negotiator to the world of bids and proposals. One particular line sticks in our mind: “Empathy is the absolute basis of trust, and trust is the absolute basis of persuasion.”

When entering your negotiations, do your clients trust you? Do they even know you? Have you demonstrated that you are ‘actively listening’?

Is negotiation training on your radar as bid professionals? When it comes to submitting your BAFO, do you assign people with the right skills to negotiate with the client? How do you avoid a ‘race to the bottom’ in your attempts to secure the deal? Are you easily able to model different scenarios that allow you to flex your solution, assumptions and dependencies, or is it a complex reinvention of the wheel that requires you to start the deal approval process all over again?

Award

You won! Now what?
Do you have a detailed bid handover plan and process for engaging delivery/implementation? Do you formally recognise the team’s achievement, including team members who work remotely? Are you personally rewarded? Your methods for handling success will set the tone for your next challenge.

No sooner has one bid been submitted than we’re on to the next. What drives us to start over, reenergise, and compete again? And why do we do it? Because successful bid and proposal professionals share a common trait: they thrive on winning. They excel under pressure, translating collective effort into winning bids.

Few of us have our pay directly linked to bid success. Even in organisations with highly evolved strategic bid functions, financial rewards are often disconnected from results. Many people are measured by quality metrics – which are vital – but we firmly believe there are no winners on a losing team.

How do you motivate the team and eliminate the ‘blame game’ if you’ve lost?
Requesting feedback provides valuable insights into how your submission was evaluated, highlights areas for improvement, and helps refine your approach to strengthen future bids. Understanding the reasons for a loss can turn setbacks into opportunities for growth and increased competitiveness.

Feedback also provides clarity if you need to challenge the outcome of public sector bids – but proceed carefully and be prepared to lose the battle. Ensure there is a valid, demonstrable mistake before challenging; simply being the lowest priced bidder or feeling misunderstood is not enough. Obtain professional advice before contacting the authority to request clarification or address potential process errors. Always consider the potential impact on your future relationship with the authority and other public sector clients. Aim to resolve the issue through correspondence between the parties wherever possible. You can bring court proceedings as a last resort, but they are costly and there is no guarantee of success.

Learning Reviews

“We won because of our relationship.” “We lost because we were too expensive.” Do your learning reviews get underneath these all too frequent responses?

Learning reviews can be one of the most cost-effective ways of improving your win rate, yet they tend to have a very high rate of ‘no-shows’. We understand that you won because you ‘did everything right’, so why analyse it? And of course, if you lost, it was most likely on price and people are too busy trying to win the next one to commit time to a post-mortem that will have no immediate benefit for them.

And that’s why many learning reviews falter before they even get underway. They should not be about winning or losing – they should be focussed on what you can do differently; do better; more efficiently; more effectively; with improved quality and focus next time. Hence, in our opinion learning reviews need to be carried out very soon after the bid is submitted. We understand the reluctance to run learning reviews before the client has awarded the business (and hence why it sits after Award in our cycle), but it can make for a much more honest, productive, and blame free session.

Do you run learning reviews on everything you touch, or just the large strategic deals? As a bid professional, do you take responsibility for feeding back the learnings to the key stakeholders in the business? Are learning reviews regularly changing how you qualify deals, or do you take your client’s word that you were a ‘close second’ and hope for better next time?

Contract Renewal Strategies

Your ‘A-Team’ won the original bid but do you take the same approach with the re-bid? Is incumbent complacency fully understood?

It’s widely accepted that people are more likely to buy from people they like and trust. Indeed, we preached about the importance of trust in our Negotiation stage.

However, we firmly believe when it comes to renewals, and the process of qualifying them, too much ‘value’ can be put on the relationships that have been developed, with the ‘substance’ of the offer becoming somewhat secondary. In short, you take your eye off the ball but justify this complacency by regularly have lunch with someone on the procurement team. Good luck with that.

Graham Ablett wrote a brilliant article in BQ8 discussing the importance of developing proactive renewal strategies. He talks about the ‘pyramid of renewal doom’ and how bid and proposal teams can help coach their sales teams through the renewal process. With many buyers more than halfway through their purchasing cycle when they issue a RFP, there are many opportunities as the incumbent to influence your customer before they go to market.

How do you manage renewals? Does your bid process full take account of them? Do they get the same level of attention as new business?